Everything you need

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam condimentum maximus feugiat. Curabitur elementum viverra dolor at blandit. Vestibulum in mollis libero. Ut vulputate fringilla est.

  • Mauris eu erat elit. Ut quis orci nec dolor;
  • Mauris eu erat elit. Ut quis orci nec dolor;
  • Mauris eu erat elit. Ut quis orci nec dolor.
Ready to try out our new app?


Research for European Parliament – Public Private Partnerships and Cohesion Policy

The objective of this study is to describe the role of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in Cohesion Policy. In the report, Filippo Addarii presented Treviso Hospital as a success study case.

Social Innovation for future Europe – proposal by PlusValue

The European Commission (DG Research and Innovation) tasked PlusValue to identify solutions and make recommendations for a revived social innovation agenda of the Union. The study Vision and Trends of Social Innovation for Europe is the outcome of the research undertaken by Filippo Addarii and Fiorenza Lipparini and published by the European Commission

Social outcome-based regeneration: a new vision for the renewal of our cities

By Andrea Ruckstuhl (Lendlease) Fiorenza Lipparini (PlusValue) Filippo Addarii (PlusValue)

What our users say

The objective of this study is to describe the role of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in Cohesion Policy. The study finds that the use of PPPs in Cohesion Policy has been limited and concentrated in a number of Member States and sectors, in spite of favourable regulatory changes. Evidence shows that PPPs are useful instruments to implement projects on time and on budget, but the assessment of outcomes over the long- term period is still limited and not conclusive.

Find it here

In the report, Filippo Addarii presented Treviso Hospital as a success study case.

The EIB provided a loan of EUR 29 million, backed by an EFSI guarantee, to Ospedal Grando S.p.A., a special vehicle company established for designing, constructing and operating the new Cittadella della Salute within the Ca’ Foncello Hospital in Treviso. Under this PPP contract, the local health authority, Azienda Unità Locale Socio Sanitaria n. 2 Marca Trevigiana, has granted a 21-year concession to Ospedal Grando. This is a social sector investment that was not eligible for financing under Veneto Region OP, although some components, particularly those related to energy efficiency, could have received ESIF support. This is also the first EFSI project where the benefits of lower EIB’s financing, as compared to commercial lenders, have been allocated in favour of social impact investments.


Research for REGI Committee – Public Private Partnerships and Cohesion Policy

PDF HERE – PlusValue Beyond Social

PlusValue’s effort in researching and analysing the whys and hows technology is impacting our world and can maximize social impact has produced a crucial amount of results and publications. In its work in IESI, REIsearch and in its latest Visions and Trends of Social Innovation for Europe, PlusValue has highlighted trends, opportunity and challenges to build the field.

This latest research was carried out in partnership with HER, who made available their cutting-edge technology to collect and analyse online data in 54 different languages via natural language processing, machine learning, pattern and named entity recognition and network and sentiment analysis to better understand what people express when they express about the impact that internet technologies will have on their lives, jobs and on society at large in the next future.

669.734 messages generated from 355.451 users, between November 10, 2016 and April 30, 2017.

It’s aim is to better understand stakeholders’ thoughts, expectations, desires, concerns, visions and imaginations based on their expressions when talking about internet technologies and their impact on our lives, societies and the economy.

Fiorenza Lipparini worked with Oriana Persico, Salvatore Iaconesi, Guido Romeo, Emanuele Rizzardi and Eugenio De Matteis.

We had great fun designing and discussing this piece of research, as well as lots of sleepless nights validating tons of data and browsing through network graphs to understand their meaning. We would be very happy to hear from everybody interested in these topics.

Beyond Social

Find it here

The European Commission (DG Research and Innovation) tasked PlusValue to identify solutions and make recommendations for a revived social innovation agenda of the Union. The study Vision and Trends of Social Innovation for Europe is the outcome of the research undertaken by Filippo Addarii and Fiorenza Lipparini and recently published by the European Commission

Europe is facing big challenges: an ageing society, mass migration, rapid changes in family structures, shrinking share of global GDP and the combined effects of globalization and automation on the labor market. Social cohesion is eroding daily. People’s trust in the ability of institutions to build a fair and flourishing society is waning. Public confidence in institutions is in free fall. New generations are ever more disconnected from representative democracy.

The European Commission has led forward-thinking in the last year through a review of social policies to tackle the unintended consequences of innovation. Brussels jargon calls this “Social Europe”. Yet, the solution is not the traditional Welfare State. The economic and social conditions are not in place to replicate the welfare state of post-war Europe. Instead, Europe needs a systematic plan that tackles social problems embedded in industrial policy for innovation and growth. This is social innovation.

Here is our proposal in a nutshell. The new European Social Innovation is Human-centered, System focused and unwaveringly political. Above all, it requires a great deal of ambition and political capital to challenge the status quo – especially vested interests in current institutional arrangements – to build a new generation of institutions and diffused capacity to catalyze and coordinate the action of diverse peoples, companies and public bodies, balancing top-down and bottom-up approaches, and combining effective action with public accountability

Vision and Trends of Social Innovation for Europe

By Andrea Ruckstuhl (Lendlease) Fiorenza Lipparini (PlusValue) Filippo Addarii (PlusValue)

A great masterpiece of Italian Renaissance is “The Ideal City” attributed to Piero della Francesca. This urban perspective on a square in which every building is designed to follow a divine-like plan and every architectonic detail is in harmony with the totality is the archetype for urban design to this day: the computational and efficient rationality as the absolute master of the planet. But if we distract the sight from the hypnotic beauty of the image an obvious question should come to mind: Where are the people? They are the only reason for a city to exist. Their diverse and chaotic lives make a city alive.

In addition to people being the main reason for the existence of urban settlements, people are the engines of city development and prosperity. People’s activities and institutions make urban spaces alive. They are the source of any success.

The need to rediscover the full value of this simple fact has moved us to reflect on urban regeneration and to come up with a new approach. This is now more urgent than ever, as the majority of the world population live in cities. Since 1990, migration to urban areas has become a global trend with 54% of the global population living in cities and the proportion being forecasted to grow to 66% by 2050.

In the last decades, urban regeneration has been a driver of cities’ growth, leading to the creation of ever more mega-cities with over 10m population. A need for space associated with better life quality and work opportunities has driven the first era of urban regeneration projects. Indeed, major investments in infrastructure and real estate have catalysed efforts to create new businesses and services as cities have expanded.

However, plans have taken a different turn when implemented. Fast and often uncontrolled urban development has had a negative impact on the quality of space and affordability for local communities, who were forced to relocate when unable to afford the costs of regenerated neighbourhoods. All in all, new developments have too often lowered the quality of life for large swathes of the population, driving up inequality and reducing social cohesion. This is ethically unacceptable and, in the long run, cripples the sustainability of cities as drivers of innovation and prosperity.

Therefore, we propose a radical change of paradigm for urban regeneration: shifting from material to social development. This is a Copernican Revolution, as social values and increasing prosperity of communities become the drivers for the master plan, capital investment and governance. Naturally, this is a new business model for regeneration. By engaging with and investing in communities, urban regeneration ensures that physical assets increase in value over time. This is social outcome-based regeneration. Profitability is generated not by buildings and infrastructures but by the wellbeing and productivity of communities using those assets.

Here are the three main pillars of social outcome-based regeneration.


The first two components synergically combined to design the master plan are community and digital design.

Community design means understanding population dynamics, habits, movements, interactions, as well as needs and aspirations, in order to devise a population model and identify elements which could facilitate and reinforce positive dynamics and offset negative ones. The model should look at different layers of dynamics, including not only all drivers e.g. living, working, free time, sport; but also the main elements of constraints e.g. access, circulation, security, weather. The entire exercise requires the involvement of civic entrepreneurs and civil society to positively engage the community

Digital design means figuring out how technology can make life easier and empower individuals and community action. Technology is changing the way we work, live and play to an extent and at a pace which are unprecedented. Digital design opens enormous opportunities for innovation and improvement of life and business both online and offline, i.e. impact on physical and social design. Technology can also be disruptive and misused. Great attention must be paid to privacy, security and ownership of data.

Physical Masterplanning follows. Once a clearer understanding of the community dynamics is achieved, the building blocks of the master plan provide solutions for the physical design which will allow the community to magnify positive interactions and achieve positive outcomes. This is not to turn into social engineering: the goal is to support existing dynamics and collective aspirations. The design is a collective effort that includes diversity in views and experiences; a multiplicity of goals and identities all united in diversity – the motto of the European Union.

At this stage, all the elements which “make a space” should be considered, including the availability and quality of public spaces, green areas and buildings. It is also important to design the place keeping in mind that “beauty” is a key objective, where all these elements come together, and where art and music can complete the space, linking the community to the physical components and creating a sense of belonging. All expressions of creativity should populate every moment of daily experience: shared, augmented and constantly transformed by digital technologies. We want to turn streets into art galleries and public spaces into cultural platforms.

Masterplanning is a living exercise that replaces the master plan. A place is never the same but it constantly evolves with the community. This simple concept should be part of the physical brief of the master plan. How do we make the place resilient and able to adapt to change? Where do we invest to make sure that we can always meet fast-changing needs and take advantage of even more fast-changing technologies? The principles of living, working and playing are changing, and any new space being created should not only capture changes but embrace them. Should the capital be invested in the hard and unmovable brick and mortar model or should we be looking at different materials and different models of owning, using and moving within the space created? These are the questions that make the master plan a living exercise.

Capital market is part of masterplanning, since the ability to attract investors is key to ensure a conducive ecosystem where old and new businesses can thrive. Long-term investors are ready to invest large sums for urban transformation, but demand a clear plan on value generation in all its expressions, including social impact and environmental sustainability. Greater transparency could mean greater investments, alignment of public and private interests and, ultimately, diffused prosperity.


Social impact investing as an investment philosophy that strikes a balance between private profitability and public value creation is transforming capital markets and, in our view, is a core component of urban regeneration – not just a mere fix of social problems which might damage the regeneration project.

Social impact investing supports communities in all their needs and aspirations, starting with civic engagement and entrepreneurship. Yet, this is not the whole story. Access to social impact capital can attract people and their initiatives to come and work, live and enjoy the new place. Then, a new paradigm for urban regenerations emerges. Firstly, we will be serving a selected market of informed and committed users, providing much-needed capital to a clear, identifiable and direct new market. We will provide better design and closer market response. This is true for any initiative in the service space. Secondly, by encouraging the creation of new products and services aiming at improving the quality of life of people living, working or visiting the new place, we will make the place more attractive, therefore driving more demand and an even more selective market for our impact initiatives. This is a circular economy where demand is expressed and answered via dedicated capital allocated to design and delivery of better services and products, aiming at achieving both economic returns and positive social outcomes with a systemic effect on community improvement.

The upside for investors is multiple as well. They will benefit from the SII component embedded in the project financing of urban regeneration, as resident communities are more resilient and better served, which in turn means their investment in the place will maintain and grow in value over time in a way which would be otherwise impossible. Institutional investors might also consider – and indeed this already happens –  to invest in the new place with a combination of capital allocation. On the one hand, the traditional alternative assets that include real estate and infrastructures, all elements that are fundamental in an urban regeneration project. On the other hand, the social impact component. This second strand will increase the total value of the investment as better products and services will improve community quality of life. It’s a win-win offer for investors, businesses and communities.


The third pillar of our approach, that we provisionally define as ‘the enterprise model’, strikes at the core of the governance and business model of urban regeneration. This is still work in progress and needs validation. The goal is to invest and capture the value generated by a successful place and its prosperous community (or the other way around).

A traditional real estate or infrastructure model would determine its value based on a discounted future cash flow that can be higher or lower depending on the stability and visibility of such cash flow, its maturity and the risk associated with it.

We have already discussed the possibility that a well-designed master plan and a better-managed community, supported by the social impact investing component, would increase the value of the whole operation by creating a resilient, equitable and prospering community.  From the perspective of investors, this would translate to increased certainty of cash flow, making the project more attractive.

But what if we can demonstrate that the community growing in the new place, over time, performs better than others? That students get better marks, scientists and businesspeople are more successful and the perceived quality of life is higher than in comparable places across a range of indicators: from access to childcare through quality and variety of cultural offer to lower rates of physical and mental sickness?

Beyond comparatively decreasing the “public” cost of that community, can this result be defined and  described into a model and, as such, become the core competence of the urban regeneration industry? Can the creation of positive, measurable and replicable socio-economic outcomes become the main know-how of an enterprise and, similarly can the ability to manufacture a car or a smartphone to the highest standards, be recognised by the market and priced accordingly? Can the traditional future cash flow be replaced by a multiple analysis? Can investment not be limited to the development of office blocks, retail space or even new services, but be directed to an urban enterprise that has better quality of life as a product?

It might look ironic but looking back in history this was the interpretation that Ambrogio Lorenzetti gave of the development of the city of Siena a century before Piero della Francesca. In his famous “The Allegory of Good Government”, the Italian painter represented the prosperous city as a hustling and bustling community based on a variety of activities, kinds of people and effective institutions. There is no geometrical order but a lively and happy place. That was the symbol of great Italian Communes in the Late Middle Ages and, we propose, should serve as an inspiration for the renewal of our future cities.

This article expresses the view of the authors without any implication or commitment by the respective organisations

Social outcome-based regeneration: a new vision for the renewal of our cities CEO@google.com